[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161029.120102.2254330014511044545.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:01:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: aconole@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, jarod@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] virtio-net: Update the mtu code to match
virtio spec
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:12:12 -0400
> The virtio committee recently ratified a change, VIRTIO-152, which
> defines the mtu field to be 'max' MTU, not simply desired MTU.
>
> This commit brings the virtio-net device in compliance with VIRTIO-152.
>
> Additionally, drop the max_mtu branch - it cannot be taken since the u16
> returned by virtio_cread16 will never exceed the initial value of
> max_mtu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> ---
> Nothing code-wise has changed, but I've included the ACKs and fixed up the
> subject line.
Applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists