linux-kernel - Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gNyUMU+r-N-qa6ZrF0zG2AuirR0NqVRu40jAgNqc5MNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:59:58 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Cc:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
<regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
> JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll
> watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress
> in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@...mhuis.info
> in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another
> mail thread for example). tia!
>
> Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is
> discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else?

Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the
experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it.