[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161031093829.GA8845@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:38:29 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result
On Sun, 30 Oct, at 08:59:58AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
> <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
> > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll
> > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress
> > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@...mhuis.info
> > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another
> > mail thread for example). tia!
> >
> > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is
> > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else?
>
> Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the
> experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it.
Of course, if you are willing to help with debugging, Thorsten, it
would be much appreciated and this bug might get fixed sooner.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists