linux-kernel - Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 00:41:18 +0000
From:   "Neri, Ricardo" <ricardo.neri@...el.com>
To:     "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:     "regressions@...mhuis.info" <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "matt@...eblueprint.co.uk" <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        "pjones@...hat.com" <pjones@...hat.com>,
        "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 08:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
> <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
> > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll
> > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress
> > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@...mhuis.info
> > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another
> > mail thread for example). tia!
> >
> > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is
> > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else?
> 
> Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the
> experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Dan, was there a special configuration that you enabled for this bug?
The person working on the bug can't reproduce the bug in v4.9-rc1 or
v4.9-rc3.