[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161101140127.GB16815@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:01:27 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.com>, Ming@...e.de,
"Lei <tom.leiming"@gmail.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] loop: Add 'lo_logical_blocksize'
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:37:18PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Add a new field 'lo_logical_blocksize' to hold the logical
> blocksize of the loop device.
Why do we use the same flag for both block sizes? If there is a good
reason for that it should be documented and both should be in the same
patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists