lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:02:08 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.com>, Ming@...e.de,
        "Lei <tom.leiming"@gmail.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] loop: Pass logical blocksize in 'lo_init[0]' ioctl
        field

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:37:19PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The current LOOP_SET_STATUS64 ioctl has two unused fields
> 'init[2]', which can be used in conjunction with the
> LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag to pass in the new logical blocksize.

Can we give them sane field names while at it?  Also I see now reason
not to merge this with the previous two patches.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ