[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73bc1e52-d728-a61b-69f3-a567c0b05e28@metafoo.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 20:58:23 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.consulting>,
Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
knaack.h@....de, pmeerw@...erw.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] staging: iio: set proper supply name to
devm_regulator_get()
On 11/01/2016 05:03 AM, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com> wrote:
>> The name passed to devm_regulator_get() should match the name of the
>> supply as specified in the device datasheet. This makes it clear what
>> power supply is being referred to in case of presence of other
>> regulators.
>>
>> Currently, the supply name specified on the affected devices is 'vcc'.
>> Use lowercase version of the datasheet name to specify the supply
>> voltage.
>>
>
> Aren't we possibly breaking current device tree definitions that
> people may have? We should still check the old name after the new
> datasheet name in my opinion.
None of those drivers have DT bindings, so I think we are OK. And they are
in staging anyway.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists