[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33f1004e-bbc8-5074-3e67-38cd98d3915c@rock-chips.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:33:15 +0800
From: "jay.xu" <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
huangtao@...k-chips.com, zhangqing@...k-chips.com,
zhengxing@...k-chips.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lintao@...k-chips.com, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix some clocks' name to be more standard
style
Hi Heiko and Shawn:
ok, I agree with you, and the root fix seems to fix it in the TRM first.
I'll feedback to TRM makers.
Thanks.
On 2016年11月03日 22:32, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. November 2016, 16:52:48 schrieb Shawn Lin:
>> On 2016/11/2 15:04, Jianqun Xu wrote:
>>> Fix aclk_emmcgrf to aclk_emmc_grf, and fix aclk_emmccore to be
>>> aclk_emmc_core.
>>
>> What is the standard style should be?
>>
>> TRM uses aclk_emmccore but not aclk_emmc_core, so should it be more
>> standrad to keep it as-is?
>
> I tend to agree with Shawn. While it looks like the missing "_" is some sort
> of mistake, we should strive to follow TRM naming, so grepping so it becomes
> easier to look for informations in these things in the TRM.
>
> Same reason for naming our regulators and pinctrl after the names used in
> device schematics, if available.
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists