[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92ac10c1-84e4-0e73-a12d-69e66aac9c45@leemhuis.info>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 14:43:33 +0100
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit
pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook
Hi! On 26.10.2016 17:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 15:06 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 08:19 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>
>> So the conclusion is to apply this patch now and go and look further @
>> locking in a separate series right ? There's not much point in leaving
>> Edison not booting as is the case with tip-of-tree right now.
> That's what I think is a summary of the discussion.
Did anything happen after that conclusion? Just wondering, because this
bug is on the list of regressions for 4.9 and I think the proposed fix
hasn't reached mainline yet (or did I miss it?)
Ciao, Thorsten (regression tracker for 4.9)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists