linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] pinctrl-aspeed-g5: Never set SCU90[6]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:34:14 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc:     Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] pinctrl-aspeed-g5: Never set SCU90[6]

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:

> In the future I think we should send fixes separately from the rest of
> the series, so it's clear to Linus where we expect patches to end up.
>
> Perhaps Linus can share his preference with us?

Just make it clear to me where the patch is headed, if it is
a fix or a new feature.

Also mixing stuff in big series is of course problematic because
all the CC:in on MFD patches and whatnot that I don't apply
makes the picture blurry, but sometimes it is anyways needed
for context so it is a soft requirement.

Yours,
Linus Walleij