[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV4HG0aOr4Qp_OZXU=3jLeOJ2QaMKp09a3v4489ABbRcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:35:31 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] soc: renesas: Identify SoC and register with the
SoC bus
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> Some Renesas SoCs may exist in different revisions, providing slightly
> different functionalities (e.g. R-Car H3 ES1.x and ES2.0), and behavior
> (errate and quirks). This needs to be catered for by drivers and/or
> platform code. The recently proposed soc_device_match() API seems like
> a good fit to handle this.
>
> This patch series implements the core infrastructure to provide SoC and
> revision information through the SoC bus for Renesas ARM SoCs. It
> consists of 7 patches:
> - Patches 1-4 provide soc_device_match(), with some related fixes,
> - Patches 5-7 implement identification of Renesas SoCs and
> registration with the SoC bus,
>
> Changes compared to v1:
> - Add Acked-by,
> - New patches:
> - "[4/7] base: soc: Provide a dummy implementation of
> soc_device_match()",
> - "[5/7] ARM: shmobile: Document DT bindings for CCCR and PRR",
> - "[6/7] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add device node for PRR"
> (more similar patches available, I'm not yet spamming you all
> with them),
> - Drop SoC families and family names; use fixed "Renesas" instead,
> - Drop EMEV2, which doesn't have a chip ID register, and doesn't share
> devices with other SoCs,
> - Drop RZ/A1H and R-CAR M1A, which don't have chip ID registers (for
> M1A: not accessible from the ARM core?),
> - On arm, move "select SOC_BUS" from ARCH_RENESAS to Kconfig symbols
> for SoCs that provide a chip ID register,
> - Build renesas-soc only if SOC_BUS is enabled,
> - Use "renesas,prr" and "renesas,cccr" device nodes in DT if
> available, else fall back to hardcoded addresses for compatibility
> with existing DTBs,
> - Remove verification of product IDs; just print the ID instead,
> - Don't register the SoC bus if the chip ID register is missing,
> - Change R-Mobile APE6 fallback to use PRR instead of CCCR (it has
> both).
>
> Merge strategy:
> - In theory, patches 1-4 should go through Greg's driver core tree.
> But it's a hard dependency for all users.
> If people agree, I can provide an immutable branch in my
> renesas-drivers repository, to be merged by all interested parties.
> So far I'm aware of Freescale/NXP, and Renesas.
And Samsung.
Shall I create the immutable branch now?
Thanks!
> - Patches 5-7 obviously have to go through Simon's Renesas tree (after
> merging the soc_device_match() core), and arm-soc.
>
> Tested on (machine, soc_id, optional revision):
> EMEV2 KZM9D Board, emev2
> Genmai, r7s72100
> APE6EVM, r8a73a4, ES1.0
> armadillo 800 eva, r8a7740, ES2.0
> bockw, r8a7778
> marzen, r8a7779, ES1.0
> Lager, r8a7790, ES1.0
> Koelsch, r8a7791, ES1.0
> Porter, r8a7791, ES3.0
> Blanche, r8a7792, ES1.1
> Gose, r8a7793, ES1.0
> Alt, r8a7794, ES1.0
> Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7795, r8a7795, ES1.0
> Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7795, r8a7795, ES1.1
> Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7796, r8a7796, ES1.0
> KZM-A9-GT, sh73a0, ES2.0
>
> For your convenience, this series (incl. more DT updates to add device
> nodes for CCCR and PRR to all other Renesas ARM SoCs) is also available
> in the topic/renesas-soc-id-v2 branch of my renesas-drivers git
> repository at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git
> Its first user is support for R-Car H3 ES2.0 in branch
> topic/r8a7795-es2-v1-rebased2.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> Arnd Bergmann (1):
> base: soc: Introduce soc_device_match() interface
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven (6):
> base: soc: Early register bus when needed
> base: soc: Check for NULL SoC device attributes
> base: soc: Provide a dummy implementation of soc_device_match()
> ARM: shmobile: Document DT bindings for CCCR and PRR
> arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add device node for PRR
> soc: renesas: Identify SoC and register with the SoC bus
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt | 26 +++++
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig | 3 +
> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi | 5 +
> drivers/base/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/base/soc.c | 79 +++++++++++++
> drivers/soc/renesas/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/sys_soc.h | 9 ++
> 9 files changed, 256 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists