lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLUPR02MB16830DECB29262BACBA94FA681A60@BLUPR02MB1683.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:04:43 +0000
From:   Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To:     Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:     Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Linux SCSI Mailinglist <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset miscalculation

On 11/08/16 00:45, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Commit 540eb1eef 'scsi: libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset calculation'
> removed the use of 'struct timespec' from fc_get_host_stats(). This broke the
> output of 'fcoeadm -s' after kernel 4.8-rc1 as lport->boot_time - jiffies
> could become negative as in this example:
>
> $ cat /sys/class/fc_host/host8/statistics/seconds_since_last_reset
> 0x10624dd2f1977b4
>
> Take this into account so
> /sys/class/fc_host/hostX/statistics/seconds_since_last_reset is sane again.
>
> Fixes: 540eb1eef ('scsi: libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset calculation')
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
> Tested-by: Holger Schranz <holger@...-schranz.de>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
> index 04ce7cf..475c0a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
> @@ -304,11 +304,15 @@ struct fc_host_statistics *fc_get_host_stats(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
>  	unsigned int cpu;
>  	u64 fcp_in_bytes = 0;
>  	u64 fcp_out_bytes = 0;
> +	unsigned long boot_time = lport->boot_time;
>
>  	fc_stats = &lport->host_stats;
>  	memset(fc_stats, 0, sizeof(struct fc_host_statistics));
>
> -	fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (lport->boot_time - jiffies) / HZ;
> +	if (boot_time > jiffies)
> +		fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (boot_time - jiffies) / HZ;
> +	else
> +		fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (jiffies - boot_time) / HZ;
>
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>  		struct fc_stats *stats;

Hello Johannes,

I think the above code will miscalculate seconds_since_last_reset if 
'jiffies' wraps around after an lport has been created and before 
seconds_since_last_reset is computed. Shouldn't seconds_since_last_reset 
be computed as follows?

	fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (jiffies - boot_time) / HZ;

Bart.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ