[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161115091840.7cldqui4dpi7nrz5@linux-x5ow.site>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:18:40 +0100
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux SCSI Mailinglist <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset miscalculation
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:04:43PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
[...]
> Hello Johannes,
>
> I think the above code will miscalculate seconds_since_last_reset if
> 'jiffies' wraps around after an lport has been created and before
> seconds_since_last_reset is computed. Shouldn't seconds_since_last_reset
> be computed as follows?
>
> fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (jiffies - boot_time) / HZ;
But what happens when jiffies - boot_time becomes negative? Then we
reintroduce the bug again and have 'fcoeadm -s' show weird values.
Byte,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@...e.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
Powered by blists - more mailing lists