[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:45:04 +0100
From: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Including images on Sphinx documents
Am 11.11.2016 um 12:22 schrieb Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de> wrote:
>>> Could this POC persuade you, if so, I send a more elaborate RFC,
>>> what do you think about?
>>
>> Sorry, I do not wish to be part of this.
>
> That was uncalled for, apologies.
It's OK, sometimes we are all in a hurry and want shorten things.
> Like I said, I don't think this is the right approach. Call it an
> unsubstantiated gut feel coming from experience.
Yes, building a bunch of symbolic links "smells". Unfortunately,
I currently see no other solution to solve the conflict of
Linux's "O=/foo" and Sphinx's "sourcedir", so that was my
proposal.
> However, I do not have
> the time to properly dig into this either, and that frustrates me. I
> wish I could be more helpful, but I can't right now.
its a pity
-- Markus --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists