[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161113125250.779df4dd@lwn.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 12:52:50 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: Including images on Sphinx documents
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 07:55:24 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com> wrote:
> So, we have a few alternatives:
>
> 1) copy (or symlink) all rst files to Documentation/output (or to the
> build dir specified via O= directive) and generate the *.pdf there,
> and produce those converted images via Makefile.;
>
> 2) add an Sphinx extension that would internally call ImageMagick and/or
> inkscape to convert the bitmap;
>
> 3) if possible, add an extension to trick Sphinx for it to consider the
> output dir as a source dir too.
So, obviously, I've been letting this go by while dealing with other
stuff...
I really think that 2) is the one we want. Copying all the stuff and
operating on the copies, beyond being a bit of a hack, just seems like a
recipe for weird build problems in the future.
We should figure out why PNG files don't work. Maybe I'll give that a
try at some point soon, if I can find a moment. Working around tools
bugs seems like the wrong approach.
Working from .svg seems optimial, but I don't like the --shell-escape
thing at all.
[Along those lines, we've picked up a lot of lines like this:
restricted \write18 enabled.
That, too, is shell execution stuff. I've not been able to figure out
where it came from, but I would sure like to get rid of it...]
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists