lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99d136d7-6bce-5faf-c4a9-ba55808c167d@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:11:19 -0500
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
        cov@...eaurora.org, vikrams@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: enable extended tags support for PCIe endpoints

On 11/11/2016 3:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> I should have checked the capability here before trying to enable it. 
>> > I'll post a follow up patch on this. 
>> > 
>> > Is there any other feedback?
> If this were completely safe to enable for every device that supported
> it, why would there be an enable bit in Device Control?

reading from the ECN here.

https://pcisig.com/sites/default/files/specification_documents/ECN_Extended_Tag_Enable_Default_05Sept2008_final.pdf

The initial value is implementation specific and functions are allowed
to set it to 1 by default.

> 
> I don't know anything about extended tags, but it worries me a little
> when there's a "go-fast" switch and no explanation about when and why
> we might need to go slo

Based on my observation, extended tags increase the number of reads that
can be queued up back to back downstream. Otherwise, the requests will not
make progress until 1 tag out of 32 gets available.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ