linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI: enable extended tags support for PCIe endpoints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <34f2e149-3bb1-6af2-a9f5-fbe5a050fe31@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:49:17 -0500
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
        cov@...eaurora.org, vikrams@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: enable extended tags support for PCIe endpoints

Hi Bjorn,

On 11/11/2016 3:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Is there any other feedback?
> If this were completely safe to enable for every device that supported
> it, why would there be an enable bit in Device Control?
> 
> I don't know anything about extended tags, but it worries me a little
> when there's a "go-fast" switch and no explanation about when and why
> we might need to go slow.
> 

I have v2 posted. Do you feel like applying to linux-next to get some testing
exposure or do you want to tie it to some DMI so that we enable it only on
recent HW?

Sinan

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.