[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161113112400.605992559@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 12:24:44 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Anoob Soman <anoob.soman@...rix.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 12/34] packet: call fanout_release, while UNREGISTERING a netdev
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Anoob Soman <anoob.soman@...rix.com>
[ Upstream commit 6664498280cf17a59c3e7cf1a931444c02633ed1 ]
If a socket has FANOUT sockopt set, a new proto_hook is registered
as part of fanout_add(). When processing a NETDEV_UNREGISTER event in
af_packet, __fanout_unlink is called for all sockets, but prot_hook which was
registered as part of fanout_add is not removed. Call fanout_release, on a
NETDEV_UNREGISTER, which removes prot_hook and removes fanout from the
fanout_list.
This fixes BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev->ptype_specific)) in netdev_run_todo()
Signed-off-by: Anoob Soman <anoob.soman@...rix.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -3855,6 +3855,7 @@ static int packet_notifier(struct notifi
}
if (msg == NETDEV_UNREGISTER) {
packet_cached_dev_reset(po);
+ fanout_release(sk);
po->ifindex = -1;
if (po->prot_hook.dev)
dev_put(po->prot_hook.dev);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists