| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20161113112400.559395258@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 12:24:43 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Collins <acollins@...dlepoint.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 11/34] net: Add netdev all_adj_list refcnt propagation to fix panic
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrew Collins <acollins@...dlepoint.com>
[ Upstream commit 93409033ae653f1c9a949202fb537ab095b2092f ]
This is a respin of a patch to fix a relatively easily reproducible kernel
panic related to the all_adj_list handling for netdevs in recent kernels.
The following sequence of commands will reproduce the issue:
ip link add link eth0 name eth0.100 type vlan id 100
ip link add link eth0 name eth0.200 type vlan id 200
ip link add name testbr type bridge
ip link set eth0.100 master testbr
ip link set eth0.200 master testbr
ip link add link testbr mac0 type macvlan
ip link delete dev testbr
This creates an upper/lower tree of (excuse the poor ASCII art):
/---eth0.100-eth0
mac0-testbr-
\---eth0.200-eth0
When testbr is deleted, the all_adj_lists are walked, and eth0 is deleted twice from
the mac0 list. Unfortunately, during setup in __netdev_upper_dev_link, only one
reference to eth0 is added, so this results in a panic.
This change adds reference count propagation so things are handled properly.
Matthias Schiffer reported a similar crash in batman-adv:
https://github.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/issues/680
https://www.open-mesh.org/issues/247
which this patch also seems to resolve.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Collins <acollins@...dlepoint.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/core/dev.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5204,6 +5204,7 @@ static inline bool netdev_adjacent_is_ne
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *adj_dev,
+ u16 ref_nr,
struct list_head *dev_list,
void *private, bool master)
{
@@ -5213,7 +5214,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(
adj = __netdev_find_adj(adj_dev, dev_list);
if (adj) {
- adj->ref_nr++;
+ adj->ref_nr += ref_nr;
return 0;
}
@@ -5223,7 +5224,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(
adj->dev = adj_dev;
adj->master = master;
- adj->ref_nr = 1;
+ adj->ref_nr = ref_nr;
adj->private = private;
dev_hold(adj_dev);
@@ -5262,6 +5263,7 @@ free_adj:
static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *adj_dev,
+ u16 ref_nr,
struct list_head *dev_list)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
@@ -5274,10 +5276,10 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove
BUG();
}
- if (adj->ref_nr > 1) {
- pr_debug("%s to %s ref_nr-- = %d\n", dev->name, adj_dev->name,
- adj->ref_nr-1);
- adj->ref_nr--;
+ if (adj->ref_nr > ref_nr) {
+ pr_debug("%s to %s ref_nr-%d = %d\n", dev->name, adj_dev->name,
+ ref_nr, adj->ref_nr-ref_nr);
+ adj->ref_nr -= ref_nr;
return;
}
@@ -5296,21 +5298,22 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
+ u16 ref_nr,
struct list_head *up_list,
struct list_head *down_list,
void *private, bool master)
{
int ret;
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, upper_dev, up_list, private,
- master);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr, up_list,
+ private, master);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, down_list, private,
- false);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, ref_nr, down_list,
+ private, false);
if (ret) {
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, up_list);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr, up_list);
return ret;
}
@@ -5318,9 +5321,10 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_li
}
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *upper_dev)
+ struct net_device *upper_dev,
+ u16 ref_nr)
{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr,
&dev->all_adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->all_adj_list.lower,
NULL, false);
@@ -5328,17 +5332,19 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(st
static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
+ u16 ref_nr,
struct list_head *up_list,
struct list_head *down_list)
{
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, up_list);
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(upper_dev, dev, down_list);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr, up_list);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(upper_dev, dev, ref_nr, down_list);
}
static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *upper_dev)
+ struct net_device *upper_dev,
+ u16 ref_nr)
{
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(dev, upper_dev,
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr,
&dev->all_adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->all_adj_list.lower);
}
@@ -5347,17 +5353,17 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_ne
struct net_device *upper_dev,
void *private, bool master)
{
- int ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, upper_dev);
+ int ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, upper_dev, 1);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev, 1,
&dev->adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->adj_list.lower,
private, master);
if (ret) {
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev, 1);
return ret;
}
@@ -5367,8 +5373,8 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_ne
static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev);
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(dev, upper_dev,
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev, 1);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(dev, upper_dev, 1,
&dev->adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->adj_list.lower);
}
@@ -5420,7 +5426,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struc
list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
pr_debug("Interlinking %s with %s, non-neighbour\n",
i->dev->name, j->dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
if (ret)
goto rollback_mesh;
}
@@ -5430,7 +5436,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struc
list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
pr_debug("linking %s's upper device %s with %s\n",
upper_dev->name, i->dev->name, dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
if (ret)
goto rollback_upper_mesh;
}
@@ -5439,7 +5445,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struc
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
pr_debug("linking %s's lower device %s with %s\n", dev->name,
i->dev->name, upper_dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
if (ret)
goto rollback_lower_mesh;
}
@@ -5453,7 +5459,7 @@ rollback_lower_mesh:
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
if (i == to_i)
break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
}
i = NULL;
@@ -5463,7 +5469,7 @@ rollback_upper_mesh:
list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
if (i == to_i)
break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
}
i = j = NULL;
@@ -5475,7 +5481,7 @@ rollback_mesh:
list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
if (i == to_i && j == to_j)
break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
}
if (i == to_i)
break;
@@ -5559,16 +5565,16 @@ void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_
*/
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list)
list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
/* remove also the devices itself from lower/upper device
* list
*/
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
call_netdevice_notifiers_info(NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER, dev,
&changeupper_info.info);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists