lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 13 Nov 2016 12:20:15 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net, knaack.h@....de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jon.Brenner@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: moved code block inside
 else statement

On 12/11/16 18:19, Brian Masney wrote:
> The check for ch1lux > ch0lux inside tsl2583_get_lux is only valid if
> the ratio is not equal to zero. Move the code block inside the else
> statement. This does away with the need to initialize the variables to
> zero.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Applied.
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c
> index dbb7f6a..bcdf095 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c
> @@ -167,8 +167,6 @@ static int tsl2583_get_lux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  	struct tsl2583_lux *p;
>  	struct tsl2583_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  	int i, ret;
> -	u32 ch0lux = 0;
> -	u32 ch1lux = 0;
>  
>  	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(chip->client, TSL2583_CMD_REG);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -242,22 +240,25 @@ static int tsl2583_get_lux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  	if (p->ratio == 0) {
>  		lux = 0;
>  	} else {
> +		u32 ch0lux, ch1lux;
> +
>  		ch0lux = ((ch0 * p->ch0) +
>  			  (gainadj[chip->als_settings.als_gain].ch0 >> 1))
>  			 / gainadj[chip->als_settings.als_gain].ch0;
>  		ch1lux = ((ch1 * p->ch1) +
>  			  (gainadj[chip->als_settings.als_gain].ch1 >> 1))
>  			 / gainadj[chip->als_settings.als_gain].ch1;
> -		lux = ch0lux - ch1lux;
> -	}
>  
> -	/* note: lux is 31 bit max at this point */
> -	if (ch1lux > ch0lux) {
> -		dev_dbg(&chip->client->dev, "%s: No Data - Returning 0\n",
> -			__func__);
> -		ret = 0;
> -		chip->als_cur_info.lux = 0;
> -		goto done;
> +		/* note: lux is 31 bit max at this point */
> +		if (ch1lux > ch0lux) {
> +			dev_dbg(&chip->client->dev, "%s: No Data - Returning 0\n",
> +				__func__);
> +			ret = 0;
> +			chip->als_cur_info.lux = 0;
> +			goto done;
> +		}
> +
> +		lux = ch0lux - ch1lux;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* adjust for active time scale */
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ