[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161114150119.GG3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:01:19 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] idle: add support for tasks that inject idle
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:05:10AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> +void play_idle()
> +{
> + /*
> + * Only FIFO tasks can disable the tick since they don't need the forced
> + * preemption.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(current->policy != SCHED_FIFO);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(current->nr_cpus_allowed != 1);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD));
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY));
> + rcu_sleep_check();
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + current->flags |= PF_IDLE;
> + do_idle();
> + current->flags &= ~PF_IDLE;
> +
> + preempt_fold_need_resched();
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(play_idle);
Hurm.. didn't this initially also include the setup of the timer and
take an timeout argument?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists