linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: validity should be checked prior to clock rate change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8521074.U32oiGVMPt@phil>
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:41:05 +0100
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org, xf@...k-chips.com,
        rocky.hao@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
        xxx@...k-chips.com, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: validity should be checked prior to clock rate change

Am Dienstag, 8. November 2016, 17:10:14 CET schrieb Elaine Zhang:
> If validity is not checked prior to clock rate change, clk_set_rate(
> cpu_clk, unsupported_rate) will return success, but the real clock rate
> change operation is prohibited in post clock change event. Alough post
> clock change event will report error due to unsupported clock rate is
> set, but this error message is ignored by clock framework.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rocky Hao <rocky.hao@...k-chips.com>

after Elaine clarified that the line mentioning Rocky was actually a tested-by, 
applied to my clock branch


Thanks
Heiko