[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY6dJGGAZtVNrYwV9uBzGYRH40aqCtL6XZkEQS2uaiK4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:58:38 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: iio: ad7606: replace range/range_available
with corresponding scale
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> Is it just me who thought, we need a fixed GPI like a fixed regulator?
> Would allow this sort of fixed wiring to be simply defined.
>
> Linus, worth exploring?
So if fixed regulator is for a voltage provider, this would be
pretty much the inverse: deciding for a voltage range by switching
a GPIO.
No previous experience with that, it should be outside of the
GPIO subsystem for sure...
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists