[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161115115622.j4ker3atejcodqrc@linux-x5ow.site>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:56:22 +0100
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
To: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux SCSI Mailinglist <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>,
Sudarsana Kalluru <sudarsana.kalluru@...gic.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@...gotech.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...gotech.com>,
"supporter:QLOGIC QLA2XXX FC-SCSI DRIVER"
<qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com>,
"open list:S390 ZFCP DRIVER" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list:FCOE SUBSYSTEM (libfc, libfcoe, fcoe)"
<fcoe-devel@...n-fcoe.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and
fc_bsg_job::reply directly
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
> > > Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2:
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=147637177902937&w=2
[...]
> >
> > The rational behind this is, in fc_req_to_bsgjob() we're assigning
> > job->request as req->cmd and job->request_len = req->cmd_len. But without
> > checkinf job->request_len we don't know whether we're save to touch
> > job->request (a.k.a. bsg_request).
>
> Hi Steffen,
> Did you have any chance testing this? I hacked fcping to work with non-FCoE
> and rports as well and tested with FCoE and lpfc. No problems seen from my
> side. I've also pused the series (With this change folded in) to my git
> tree at [1] if this helps you in any way.
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jth/linux.git/log/?h=scsi-bsg-rewrite-v4
>
So I finally have a test system up and running. I have good and bad news. The
good news is, I can't get the system crashing with my patches, the bad news is
I can't get zfcp_ping and zfcp_show to output something but HBA_STATUS_ERROR
with my patches and without.
And btw, I renamed the branch to fc-bsg-rewrite-v4 in case you want to clone
from it (it has patch 2/16 changed to the v3 submission).
Can you please have a look with your setup?
Thanks,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@...e.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
Powered by blists - more mailing lists