[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8647eacd-a029-dff0-4f78-dafef89a5ad9@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:31:27 +0100
From: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux SCSI Mailinglist <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>,
Sudarsana Kalluru <sudarsana.kalluru@...gic.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@...gotech.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...gotech.com>,
"supporter:QLOGIC QLA2XXX FC-SCSI DRIVER"
<qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com>,
"open list:S390 ZFCP DRIVER" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list:FCOE SUBSYSTEM (libfc, libfcoe, fcoe)"
<fcoe-devel@...n-fcoe.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] scsi: don't use fc_bsg_job::request and
fc_bsg_job::reply directly
Hi Johannes,
On 11/15/2016 12:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:38:21AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:55:11PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote:
>>>> Hm, still behaves for me like I reported for v2:
>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=147637177902937&w=2
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> The rational behind this is, in fc_req_to_bsgjob() we're assigning
>>> job->request as req->cmd and job->request_len = req->cmd_len. But without
>>> checkinf job->request_len we don't know whether we're save to touch
>>> job->request (a.k.a. bsg_request).
>>
>> Hi Steffen,
>> Did you have any chance testing this? I hacked fcping to work with non-FCoE
>> and rports as well and tested with FCoE and lpfc. No problems seen from my
>> side. I've also pused the series (With this change folded in) to my git
>> tree at [1] if this helps you in any way.
>>
>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jth/linux.git/log/?h=scsi-bsg-rewrite-v4
>>
>
> So I finally have a test system up and running. I have good and bad news. The
> good news is, I can't get the system crashing with my patches, the bad news is
> I can't get zfcp_ping and zfcp_show to output something but HBA_STATUS_ERROR
> with my patches and without.
Assuming you run the latest package version on s390x:
Do steps 2 and 3 of the procedure in
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/linuxonibm/com.ibm.linux.z.lhdd/lhdd_t_fcp_api_runappl.html
help?
The only other thing I can think of from the top of my head is that BSG
ioctls are sensitive regarding ABI and I once had the kernel ioctl
return EINVAL due to unmatching kernel-headers and libzfcphbaapi maps
this EINVAL to HBA_STATUS_ERROR because there is no more specifically
suitable HBA constant [old SUSE bugs 834498 and 834500].
> And btw, I renamed the branch to fc-bsg-rewrite-v4 in case you want to clone
> from it (it has patch 2/16 changed to the v3 submission).
>
> Can you please have a look with your setup?
I'm going to re-test hopefully within the next few days.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Steffen Maier
Linux on z Systems Development
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Powered by blists - more mailing lists