[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611151428160.3602@nanos>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:35:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/intel_rdt: Return state to default on umount
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> @@ -801,6 +801,7 @@ static void rmdir_all_sub(void)
> {
> struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, *tmp;
> struct task_struct *p, *t;
> + int cpu;
>
> /* move all tasks to default resource group */
> read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> @@ -819,10 +820,19 @@ static void rmdir_all_sub(void)
> /* Remove each rdtgroup other than root */
> if (rdtgrp == &rdtgroup_default)
> continue;
> +
> + /* Give any CPUs back to the default group */
> + cpumask_or(&rdtgroup_default.cpu_mask,
> + &rdtgroup_default.cpu_mask, &rdtgrp->cpu_mask);
That's a pointless exercise. We can simply copy cpu_online_mask to the
default group mask and be done with it. I'll fix that up.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists