lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:27:22 -0800
From:   Bin Gao <bin.gao@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bin Gao <bin.gao@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] x86/tsc: mark TSC frequency determined by CPUID as known

Unlike TSC calibration where we determin TSC frequency by another timer
with known frequency, CPUs/SoCs with CPUID leaf 0x15 come with a known
frequency and will report the frequency to software via CPUID
instruction. This hardware provided frequency is the "real" frequency
of TSC so we set the X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag to skip the whole
software calibration process.

We had a 24 hours test on one of the CPUID 0x15 capable platforms. With
PIT calibrated frequency, we got more than 3 seconds drift whereas with
CPUID determined frequency we only got less than 0.5 second drift. This
makes us believe that we should prefer CPUID determined frequency over
software calibrated frequency.

Signed-off-by: Bin Gao <bin.gao@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 3ba146e..f1a7fb5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -702,6 +702,13 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * TSC frequency determined by CPUID is a "hardware reported"
+	 * frequency and is the most accurate one so far we have. This
+	 * is considered a known frequency.
+	 */
+	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ);
+
 	return crystal_khz * ebx_numerator / eax_denominator;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ