| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-9c2791f936ef5fd04a118b5c284f2c9a95f4a647@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 04:15:42 -0800
From: tip-bot for Vincent Guittot <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Fix hierarchical order in
rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list
Commit-ID: 9c2791f936ef5fd04a118b5c284f2c9a95f4a647
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/9c2791f936ef5fd04a118b5c284f2c9a95f4a647
Author: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:53:43 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:29:08 +0100
sched/fair: Fix hierarchical order in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list
Fix the insertion of cfs_rq in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list to ensure that a
child will always be called before its parent.
The hierarchical order in shares update list has been introduced by
commit:
67e86250f8ea ("sched: Introduce hierarchal order on shares update list")
With the current implementation a child can be still put after its
parent.
Lets take the example of:
root
\
b
/\
c d*
|
e*
with root -> b -> c already enqueued but not d -> e so the
leaf_cfs_rq_list looks like: head -> c -> b -> root -> tail
The branch d -> e will be added the first time that they are enqueued,
starting with e then d.
When e is added, its parents is not already on the list so e is put at
the tail : head -> c -> b -> root -> e -> tail
Then, d is added at the head because its parent is already on the
list: head -> d -> c -> b -> root -> e -> tail
e is not placed at the right position and will be called the last
whereas it should be called at the beginning.
Because it follows the bottom-up enqueue sequence, we are sure that we
will finished to add either a cfs_rq without parent or a cfs_rq with a
parent that is already on the list. We can use this event to detect
when we have finished to add a new branch. For the others, whose
parents are not already added, we have to ensure that they will be
added after their children that have just been inserted the steps
before, and after any potential parents that are already in the list.
The easiest way is to put the cfs_rq just after the last inserted one
and to keep track of it untl the branch is fully added.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@....com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: bsegall@...gle.com
Cc: kernellwp@...il.com
Cc: pjt@...gle.com
Cc: yuyang.du@...el.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1478598827-32372-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 6bf1fd3..dc64bd7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7604,6 +7604,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
root_task_group.shares = ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+ rq->tmp_alone_branch = &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list;
/*
* How much cpu bandwidth does root_task_group get?
*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0731aff..4a67026 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -283,19 +283,59 @@ static inline struct cfs_rq *group_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *grp)
static inline void list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
if (!cfs_rq->on_list) {
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
+ int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
/*
* Ensure we either appear before our parent (if already
* enqueued) or force our parent to appear after us when it is
- * enqueued. The fact that we always enqueue bottom-up
- * reduces this to two cases.
+ * enqueued. The fact that we always enqueue bottom-up
+ * reduces this to two cases and a special case for the root
+ * cfs_rq. Furthermore, it also means that we will always reset
+ * tmp_alone_branch either when the branch is connected
+ * to a tree or when we reach the beg of the tree
*/
if (cfs_rq->tg->parent &&
- cfs_rq->tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))]->on_list) {
- list_add_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
- &rq_of(cfs_rq)->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
- } else {
+ cfs_rq->tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->on_list) {
+ /*
+ * If parent is already on the list, we add the child
+ * just before. Thanks to circular linked property of
+ * the list, this means to put the child at the tail
+ * of the list that starts by parent.
+ */
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
+ &(cfs_rq->tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->leaf_cfs_rq_list));
+ /*
+ * The branch is now connected to its tree so we can
+ * reset tmp_alone_branch to the beginning of the
+ * list.
+ */
+ rq->tmp_alone_branch = &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list;
+ } else if (!cfs_rq->tg->parent) {
+ /*
+ * cfs rq without parent should be put
+ * at the tail of the list.
+ */
list_add_tail_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
- &rq_of(cfs_rq)->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+ &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+ /*
+ * We have reach the beg of a tree so we can reset
+ * tmp_alone_branch to the beginning of the list.
+ */
+ rq->tmp_alone_branch = &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * The parent has not already been added so we want to
+ * make sure that it will be put after us.
+ * tmp_alone_branch points to the beg of the branch
+ * where we will add parent.
+ */
+ list_add_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
+ rq->tmp_alone_branch);
+ /*
+ * update tmp_alone_branch to points to the new beg
+ * of the branch
+ */
+ rq->tmp_alone_branch = &cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list;
}
cfs_rq->on_list = 1;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 345c1cc..36f30e0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ struct rq {
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
/* list of leaf cfs_rq on this cpu: */
struct list_head leaf_cfs_rq_list;
+ struct list_head *tmp_alone_branch;
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists