linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: fsl: fix section mismatch build warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <359fecae-1bd0-76d2-2d26-b6f24cf15f4a@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:10:32 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
        Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: fsl: fix section mismatch build warnings



On 16/11/16 17:07, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 4:39:27 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> @@ -223,6 +222,7 @@ static struct platform_driver fsl_guts_driver = {
>>
>>  static int __init fsl_guts_init(void)
>>  {
>> +       machine = of_flat_dt_get_machine_name();
>>         return platform_driver_register(&fsl_guts_driver);
>>  }
>>  core_initcall(fsl_guts_init);
>
> I think we simply need to use the normal DT API rather than the of_flat_* one.
>

I thought so, yes that will be better. I will respin accordingly.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep