[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161116171058.GA21300@Cayman.am.freescale.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:10:58 -0600
From: Han Xu <xhnjupt@...il.com>
To: "Krzeminski, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)"
<marcin.krzeminski@...ia.com>
Cc: Yunhui Cui <B56489@...escale.com>, Yunhui Cui <yunhui.cui@....com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"han.xu@...escale.com" <han.xu@...escale.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"jagannadh.teki@...il.com" <jagannadh.teki@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] mtd: spi-nor: Support R/W for S25FS-S family flash
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:50:55AM +0000, Krzeminski, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-mtd [mailto:linux-mtd-bounces@...ts.infradead.org] On Behalf
> > Of Han Xu
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 9:49 PM
> > To: Yunhui Cui <B56489@...escale.com>
> > Cc: Yunhui Cui <yunhui.cui@....com>; David Woodhouse
> > <dwmw2@...radead.org>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > mtd@...ts.infradead.org; han.xu@...escale.com; Brian Norris
> > <computersforpeace@...il.com>; jagannadh.teki@...il.com; linux-arm-
> > kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@....com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] mtd: spi-nor: Support R/W for S25FS-S family
> > flash
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Yunhui Cui <B56489@...escale.com>
> > wrote:
> > > From: Yunhui Cui <yunhui.cui@....com>
> > >
> > > With the physical sectors combination, S25FS-S family flash requires
> > > some special operations for read/write functions.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <yunhui.cui@....com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 56
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > > b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c index d0fc165..495d0bb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > > @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@
> > >
> > > #define SPI_NOR_MAX_ID_LEN 6
> > > #define SPI_NOR_MAX_ADDR_WIDTH 4
> > > +/* Added for S25FS-S family flash */
> > > +#define SPINOR_CONFIG_REG3_OFFSET 0x800004
> > > +#define CR3V_4KB_ERASE_UNABLE 0x8
> > > +#define SPINOR_S25FS_FAMILY_EXT_JEDEC 0x81
> > >
> > > struct flash_info {
> > > char *name;
> > > @@ -78,6 +82,7 @@ struct flash_info {
> > > };
> > >
> > > #define JEDEC_MFR(info) ((info)->id[0])
> > > +#define EXT_JEDEC(info) ((info)->id[5])
> > >
> > > static const struct flash_info *spi_nor_match_id(const char *name);
> > >
> > > @@ -899,6 +904,7 @@ static const struct flash_info spi_nor_ids[] = {
> > > */
> > > { "s25sl032p", INFO(0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64,
> > SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > > { "s25sl064p", INFO(0x010216, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 128,
> > > SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > > + { "s25fs256s1", INFO6(0x010219, 0x4d0181, 64 * 1024, 512, 0)},
> > > { "s25fl256s0", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 128, 0) },
> > > { "s25fl256s1", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 512,
> > SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > > { "s25fl512s", INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 256,
> > > SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) }, @@ -1036,6 +1042,50
> > @@ static const struct flash_info *spi_nor_read_id(struct spi_nor *nor)
> > > return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * The S25FS-S family physical sectors may be configured as a
> > > + * hybrid combination of eight 4-kB parameter sectors
> > > + * at the top or bottom of the address space with all
> > > + * but one of the remaining sectors being uniform size.
> > > + * The Parameter Sector Erase commands (20h or 21h) must
> > > + * be used to erase the 4-kB parameter sectors individually.
> > > + * The Sector (uniform sector) Erase commands (D8h or DCh)
> > > + * must be used to erase any of the remaining
> > > + * sectors, including the portion of highest or lowest address
> > > + * sector that is not overlaid by the parameter sectors.
> > > + * The uniform sector erase command has no effect on parameter
> > sectors.
> > > + */
> > > +static int spansion_s25fs_disable_4kb_erase(struct spi_nor *nor) {
> > > + u32 cr3v_addr = SPINOR_CONFIG_REG3_OFFSET;
> > > + u8 cr3v = 0x0;
> > > + int ret = 0x0;
> > > +
> > > + nor->cmd_buf[2] = cr3v_addr >> 16;
> > > + nor->cmd_buf[1] = cr3v_addr >> 8;
> > > + nor->cmd_buf[0] = cr3v_addr >> 0;
> > > +
> > > + ret = nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_SPANSION_RDAR, &cr3v, 1);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + if (cr3v & CR3V_4KB_ERASE_UNABLE)
> > > + return 0;
> > > + ret = nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WREN, NULL, 0);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + cr3v = CR3V_4KB_ERASE_UNABLE;
> > > + nor->program_opcode = SPINOR_OP_SPANSION_WRAR;
> > > + nor->write(nor, cr3v_addr, 1, &cr3v);
> > > +
> > > + ret = nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_SPANSION_RDAR, &cr3v, 1);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + if (!(cr3v & CR3V_4KB_ERASE_UNABLE))
> > > + return -EPERM;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
> > > size_t *retlen, u_char *buf) { @@ -1361,6
> > > +1411,12 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name,
> > enum read_mode mode)
> > > spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (EXT_JEDEC(info) == SPINOR_S25FS_FAMILY_EXT_JEDEC) {
> > > + ret = spansion_s25fs_disable_4kb_erase(nor);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (!mtd->name)
> > > mtd->name = dev_name(dev);
> > > mtd->priv = nor;
> > > --
> > > 2.1.0.27.g96db324
> > >
> > >
> > Hi Brian, I will ack this change but still feel it's kind of hacking code.
> >
> > Acked-by: Han xu <han.xu@....com>
>
> I am new on the list so I am not sure if this topic has been discussed.
> Generally our product functionality relay on those 4KiB sectors.
> I know that this hack is already in u-boot, but if you mainstream this
> you will force users of those 4KiB sectors to do hack the hack...
> I believe the proper solution here is to use erase regions functionality,
> I send and RFS about that some time ago.
Do you mind to send me a link for reference?
Sincerely,
Han XU
>
> Thanks,
> Marcin
>
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Han XU
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists