[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4986155b-de07-1a4c-186c-71d90b12e75c@semaphore.gr>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 21:27:22 +0200
From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency
updates
The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.
Both increase and decrease happen at steps.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
---
-> v2
Remove a trailing space
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index a48b724..7522ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
* sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
* (default), then we try to decrease frequency
*
- * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
- * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
+ * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
+ * frequency
*/
static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists