[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161117034059.GB4894@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:10:59 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining
frequency updates
On 16-11-16, 21:27, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.
>
> Both increase and decrease happen at steps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
> ---
> -> v2
> Remove a trailing space
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> index a48b724..7522ec6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
> * sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
> * (default), then we try to decrease frequency
> *
> - * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
> - * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
> + * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
> + * frequency
> */
> static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists