[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1598322.M8zmuJxMQN@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 02:17:30 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 09:10:59 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-11-16, 21:27, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> > The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.
> >
> > Both increase and decrease happen at steps.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
> > ---
> > -> v2
> > Remove a trailing space
> >
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> > index a48b724..7522ec6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> > @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
> > * sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
> > * (default), then we try to decrease frequency
> > *
> > - * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
> > - * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
> > + * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
> > + * frequency
> > */
> > static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > {
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Applied.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists