[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1514461290.13216247.1479328935760.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:42:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"Robert O'Callahan" <robert@...llahan.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)"
<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)"
<user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)"
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/7] KVM: x86: virtualize cpuid faulting
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 10, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hardware support for faulting on the cpuid instruction is not required to
> >> emulate it, because cpuid triggers a VM exit anyways. KVM handles the
> >> relevant
> >> MSRs (MSR_PLATFORM_INFO and MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLE) and upon a
> >> cpuid-induced VM exit checks the cpuid faulting state and the CPL.
> >> kvm_require_cpl is even kind enough to inject the GP fault for us.
> >
> > I think that for consistency you should also revise em_cpuid() of KVM
> > instruction emulator. Otherwise it may be a potential security
> > hazard (as far fetched as it currently seems).
>
> Hmm, ok. Do you know how I can test this code path?
Try this patch (untested!)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 5382b82462fc..06d940a7c9fa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -5868,8 +5868,7 @@ static void vmx_set_dr7(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
static int handle_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- kvm_emulate_cpuid(vcpu);
- return 1;
+ return emulate_instruction(vcpu, 0) == EMULATE_DONE;
}
static int handle_rdmsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists