[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP045ApYP6K1qtqKHEAbTR37Fdd+Gc8_-xiRMAK8XN5kzszspw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:59:30 -0800
From: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"Robert O'Callahan" <robert@...llahan.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)"
<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)"
<user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)"
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/7] KVM: x86: virtualize cpuid faulting
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Nov 10, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hardware support for faulting on the cpuid instruction is not required to
>> >> emulate it, because cpuid triggers a VM exit anyways. KVM handles the
>> >> relevant
>> >> MSRs (MSR_PLATFORM_INFO and MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLE) and upon a
>> >> cpuid-induced VM exit checks the cpuid faulting state and the CPL.
>> >> kvm_require_cpl is even kind enough to inject the GP fault for us.
>> >
>> > I think that for consistency you should also revise em_cpuid() of KVM
>> > instruction emulator. Otherwise it may be a potential security
>> > hazard (as far fetched as it currently seems).
>>
>> Hmm, ok. Do you know how I can test this code path?
>
> Try this patch (untested!)
Heh, yes, that would do it. Thanks!
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 5382b82462fc..06d940a7c9fa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -5868,8 +5868,7 @@ static void vmx_set_dr7(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long val)
>
> static int handle_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - kvm_emulate_cpuid(vcpu);
> - return 1;
> + return emulate_instruction(vcpu, 0) == EMULATE_DONE;
> }
>
> static int handle_rdmsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> Paolo
- Kyle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists