linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thermal/powerclamp: add back module device table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:42:16 -0800
From:   Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal/powerclamp: add back module device table

On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:03:32 +0100
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:08:45AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > Commit 3105f234e0aba43e44e277c20f9b32ee8add43d4 replaced module
> > cpu id table with a cpu feature check, which is logically correct.
> > But we need the module device table to allow module auto loading.
> > 
> > Fixes:3105f234 thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)  
> 
> <formletter>
> 
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree.  Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
> for how to do this properly.
> 
> </formletter>

Good to know, thanks. Rui will take care of it this time. Per Rui
"I will apply patch 1 and queue up for next -rc and 4.8 stable."

Thanks,

Jacob