linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thermal/powerclamp: add back module device table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1479699790.2360.10.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:43:10 +0800
From:   Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal/powerclamp: add back module device table

On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 11:42 -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:03:32 +0100
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:08:45AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > > 
> > > Commit 3105f234e0aba43e44e277c20f9b32ee8add43d4 replaced module
> > > cpu id table with a cpu feature check, which is logically
> > > correct.
> > > But we need the module device table to allow module auto loading.
> > > 
> > > Fixes:3105f234 thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)  
> > <formletter>
> > 
> > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> > stable kernel tree.  Please read
> > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
> > for how to do this properly.
> > 
> > </formletter>
> Good to know, thanks. Rui will take care of it this time. Per Rui
> "I will apply patch 1 and queue up for next -rc and 4.8 stable."
> 

Just find another problem.
We're still missing this upstream
commit 3105f234e0aba43e44e277c20f9b32ee8add43d4 (thermal/powerclamp:
correct cpu support check) for 4.7 stable, and in this case, we can not
queue this patch for both 4.7 and 4.8 stable at the moment because it
does not apply to 4.7 stable.

I will send this patch out asap to catch 4.9, and then send a note to
stable kernel with the following Option 2
in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt after it's merged.

thanks,
rui