| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <DB6PR0401MB24077A46D3FC5147DC4C69D989B10@DB6PR0401MB2407.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:14:21 +0000
From: Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@....com>
To: "Krzeminski, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)"
<marcin.krzeminski@...ia.com>, Han Xu <xhnjupt@...il.com>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"han.xu@...escale.com" <han.xu@...escale.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"jagannadh.teki@...il.com" <jagannadh.teki@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 6/9] mtd: spi-nor: Support R/W for S25FS-S family flash
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 06:50:55AM +0000, Krzeminski, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Yunhui Cui <B56489@...escale.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > From: Yunhui Cui <yunhui.cui@....com>
> > > > >
> > > > > With the physical sectors combination, S25FS-S family flash
> > > > > requires some special operations for read/write functions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <yunhui.cui@....com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 56
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > > > > b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c index d0fc165..495d0bb 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > > > > @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@
> > > > >
> > > > > #define SPI_NOR_MAX_ID_LEN 6
> > > > > #define SPI_NOR_MAX_ADDR_WIDTH 4
> > > > > +/* Added for S25FS-S family flash */
> > > > > +#define SPINOR_CONFIG_REG3_OFFSET 0x800004
> > > > > +#define CR3V_4KB_ERASE_UNABLE 0x8 #define
> > > > > +SPINOR_S25FS_FAMILY_EXT_JEDEC 0x81
> > > > >
> > > > > struct flash_info {
> > > > > char *name;
> > > > > @@ -78,6 +82,7 @@ struct flash_info { };
> > > > >
> > > > > #define JEDEC_MFR(info) ((info)->id[0])
> > > > > +#define EXT_JEDEC(info) ((info)->id[5])
> > > > >
> > > > > static const struct flash_info *spi_nor_match_id(const char
> > > > > *name);
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -899,6 +904,7 @@ static const struct flash_info spi_nor_ids[] = {
> > > > > */
> > > > > { "s25sl032p", INFO(0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64,
> > > > SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > > > > { "s25sl064p", INFO(0x010216, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 128,
> > > > > SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > > > > + { "s25fs256s1", INFO6(0x010219, 0x4d0181, 64 * 1024,
> > > > > + 512, 0)},
> > > > > { "s25fl256s0", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 128, 0) },
> > > > > { "s25fl256s1", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 512,
> > > > SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > > > > { "s25fl512s", INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 256,
> > > > > SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) }, @@ -1036,6
> > +1042,50
> > > > @@ static const struct flash_info *spi_nor_read_id(struct spi_nor
> > > > *nor)
> > > > > return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); }
> > > > >
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * The S25FS-S family physical sectors may be configured as a
> > > > > + * hybrid combination of eight 4-kB parameter sectors
> > > > > + * at the top or bottom of the address space with all
> > > > > + * but one of the remaining sectors being uniform size.
> > > > > + * The Parameter Sector Erase commands (20h or 21h) must
> > > > > + * be used to erase the 4-kB parameter sectors individually.
> > > > > + * The Sector (uniform sector) Erase commands (D8h or DCh)
> > > > > + * must be used to erase any of the remaining
> > > > > + * sectors, including the portion of highest or lowest address
> > > > > + * sector that is not overlaid by the parameter sectors.
> > > > > + * The uniform sector erase command has no effect on parameter
> > > > sectors.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +static int spansion_s25fs_disable_4kb_erase(struct spi_nor *nor) {
> > > > > + u32 cr3v_addr = SPINOR_CONFIG_REG3_OFFSET;
> > > > > + u8 cr3v = 0x0;
> > > > > + int ret = 0x0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + nor->cmd_buf[2] = cr3v_addr >> 16;
> > > > > + nor->cmd_buf[1] = cr3v_addr >> 8;
> > > > > + nor->cmd_buf[0] = cr3v_addr >> 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_SPANSION_RDAR, &cr3v, 1);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + if (cr3v & CR3V_4KB_ERASE_UNABLE)
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > + ret = nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WREN, NULL, 0);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + cr3v = CR3V_4KB_ERASE_UNABLE;
> > > > > + nor->program_opcode = SPINOR_OP_SPANSION_WRAR;
> > > > > + nor->write(nor, cr3v_addr, 1, &cr3v);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = nor->read_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_SPANSION_RDAR, &cr3v, 1);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + if (!(cr3v & CR3V_4KB_ERASE_UNABLE))
> > > > > + return -EPERM;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
> > > > > size_t *retlen, u_char *buf) { @@
> > > > > -1361,6
> > > > > +1411,12 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char
> > > > > +*name,
> > > > enum read_mode mode)
> > > > > spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (EXT_JEDEC(info) == SPINOR_S25FS_FAMILY_EXT_JEDEC) {
> > > > > + ret = spansion_s25fs_disable_4kb_erase(nor);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > if (!mtd->name)
> > > > > mtd->name = dev_name(dev);
> > > > > mtd->priv = nor;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.1.0.27.g96db324
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Hi Brian, I will ack this change but still feel it's kind of hacking code.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Han xu <han.xu@....com>
> > >
> > > I am new on the list so I am not sure if this topic has been discussed.
> > > Generally our product functionality relay on those 4KiB sectors.
> > > I know that this hack is already in u-boot, but if you mainstream
> > > this you will force users of those 4KiB sectors to do hack the hack...
> > > I believe the proper solution here is to use erase regions
> > > functionality, I send and RFS about that some time ago.
> >
> > Do you mind to send me a link for reference?
> >
> Han,
>
> Sorry, It seem I have not posted erase region changes (only those regarding
> DUAL/QUAD I/O).
> Generally, in this flash you need to create 3 erase regions (because in FS-S
> family support only 4KiB erase on parameters sector - eg. 1.2.2.4 in S25FS512S).
> In my case regions are:
> 1. 0-32KiB (8*4KiB) - 4K_ERASE (0x20/0x21) 2. 32 - 256 - SE_CMD (0xd8/0xdc) 3.
> Rest of the flash SE_CMD (0xd8/0xdc)
>
> To erase whole flash you can also use CHIP_ERASE_CMD (0x60/0xC7) command,
> you just need to add one more mtd partition that will cover whole flash.
>
Hi Krzeminski,
Do you think is there any great advantages for enable 4KB?
Because for NXP(Freescale) QSPI controller, there is only support max to 16 groups command.
So It's hard to give 3 groups command just for erase (0x21,0xdc and 0xc7).
So we have to disable the 4kb erase and only use 256kbytes in this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists