[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLZtrdNQ+eKy=qc_8kLVSu-ZQBE+vhbxDu6XCLFF87Y4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:50:41 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Windsor <dave@...gbits.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] kref: Implement using refcount_t
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:55:16AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> My intention with what I'm designing is to couple the "panic_on_oops"
>
> There is a panic_on_warn knob too.
Yes, and that tends to be "too much". There is a need to create
something between warn and bug.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists