[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d466f591-baac-c734-a49b-8aab763c1876@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:16:06 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, zhang.chunyan@...aro.org,
iivanov.xz@...il.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: qcom: Add apq8064 CoreSight components
On 11/17/2016 07:36 AM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <ivan.ivanov@...aro.org>
>
> Add initial set of CoreSight components found on Qualcomm's
> 8064 chipset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-coresight.dtsi | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why not put this inside the soc file? This would be the first time we
add a new file for something that's inside the SoC node that probably
won't change thereafter. At least for pins I slightly agree with having
a different file, we're adding more and more things there so it's nice
to have a consolidated place of all possible configurations to choose
from. But here it's mostly a static device description so what's the gain?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists