[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fda017e4-2902-359e-dad4-b0efd9ebeeb9@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:36:44 +0200
From: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, zhang.chunyan@...aro.org,
iivanov.xz@...il.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: qcom: Add apq8064 CoreSight components
On 11/18/2016 12:16 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/17/2016 07:36 AM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <ivan.ivanov@...aro.org>
>>
>> Add initial set of CoreSight components found on Qualcomm's
>> 8064 chipset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-coresight.dtsi | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Why not put this inside the soc file? This would be the first time we
> add a new file for something that's inside the SoC node that probably
> won't change thereafter. At least for pins I slightly agree with having
> a different file, we're adding more and more things there so it's nice
> to have a consolidated place of all possible configurations to choose
> from. But here it's mostly a static device description so what's the gain?
Ok, after thinking more about this and looking at other soc dtsi files i
agree with you. Will update!
Thanks!
Georgi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists