lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:28:08 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> cc: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/7] x86/arch_prctl/64: Rename do_arch_prctl to do_arch_prctl_64 On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com> wrote: > > > In order to introduce new arch_prctls that are not 64 bit only, rename the > > existing 64 bit implementation to do_arch_prctl_64(). Also rename the second > > argument to arch_prctl(), which will no longer always be an address. > > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > > void entry_SYSCALL_64(void); > > +long do_arch_prctl_64(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long arg2); > > #endif > > Could you please also rename the weirdly named 'code' argument to 'option', > to be in line with the existing sys_prctl() interface nomenclature? I'll fix that up when picking up the series. No need for another iteration, ok? Thanks, tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists