linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Drop fixed 200 Hz timer requirement from Samsung platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22757093.ejshJp9T7L@wuerfel>
Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:46:47 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Drop fixed 200 Hz timer requirement from Samsung platforms

On Friday, November 18, 2016 9:16:58 AM CET Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> All Samsung platforms, including the Exynos, are selecting HZ_FIXED with
> 200 Hz.  Unfortunately in case of multiplatform image this affects also
> other platforms when Exynos is enabled.
> 
> This looks like an very old legacy code, dating back to initial
> upstreaming of S3C24xx.  Probably it was required for s3c24xx timer
> driver, which was removed in commit ad38bdd15d5b ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove
> unused plat-samsung/time.c").
> 
> Since then, this fixed 200 Hz spread everywhere, including out-of-tree
> Samsung kernels (SoC vendor's and Tizen's).  I believe this choice
> was rather an effect of coincidence instead of conscious choice.
> 
> Exynos uses its own MCT or arch timer and can work with all HZ values.
> Older platforms use newer Samsung PWM timer driver which should handle
> down to 100 Hz.
> 
> Few perf mem and sched tests on Odroid XU3 board (Exynos5422, 4x Cortex
> A7, 4x Cortex A15) show no regressions when switching from 200 Hz to
> other values.
> 
> Reported-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> [Dropping 200_HZ from S3C/S5P suggested by Arnd]
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> 

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Maybe add a paragraph about the specific problem:

"On s3c24xx, the PWM counter is only 16 bit wide, and with the
typical 12MHz input clock that overflows every 5.5ms. This works
with HZ=200 or higher but not with HZ=100 which needs a 10ms
interval between ticks. On Later chips (S3C64xx, S5P and EXYNOS),
the counter is 32 bits and does not have this problem.
The new samsung_pwm_timer driver solves the problem by scaling
the input clock by a factor of 50 on s3c24xx, which makes it
less accurate but allows HZ=100 as well as CONFIG_NO_HZ with
fewer wakeups".

	Arnd