[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25389.1479458901@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:48:21 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:
> > If neither AT_STATX_*_SYNC flag is set, the behaviour is the default for
> > stat() on that filesystem.
> >
>
> We also need to specify here what happens if both bits are set. Should
> that be -EINVAL?
Makes sense.
This leads to another thought: should fstatat() be allowed to take AT_STATX_*
flags?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists