linux-kernel - RE: [char-misc-next 4/4] mei: bus: enable non-blocking RX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B5432C477@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:30:25 +0000
From:   "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [char-misc-next 4/4] mei: bus: enable non-blocking RX


> 
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:22:24PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > Just make a new function mei_cldev_recv_async() and then call a
> > > local, static function, that does the work with the correct flag
> > > set.  That way the developer always knows exactly what is going on.
> >
> > We can do a wrapper, but _async() is not proper here maybe
> > _nonblock(),
> 
> Yes, I just guessed at the name :)

Understood, any how I believe that we should keep patch as is, there is no one
API _nonblock() function in the whole kernel unlike _async(), 
nonblock  is always passed in as a flag or Boolean. 

Tomas