[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161119092037.082414573@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:22:54 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 02/49] net: clear sk_err_soft in sk_clone_lock()
4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit e551c32d57c88923f99f8f010e89ca7ed0735e83 ]
At accept() time, it is possible the parent has a non zero
sk_err_soft, leftover from a prior error.
Make sure we do not leave this value in the child, as it
makes future getsockopt(SO_ERROR) calls quite unreliable.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/core/sock.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1563,6 +1563,7 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct
RCU_INIT_POINTER(newsk->sk_reuseport_cb, NULL);
newsk->sk_err = 0;
+ newsk->sk_err_soft = 0;
newsk->sk_priority = 0;
newsk->sk_incoming_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
atomic64_set(&newsk->sk_cookie, 0);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists