linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.8 04/49] bgmac: stop clearing DMA receive control register right after it is set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161119092037.405381748@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:22:56 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 04/49] bgmac: stop clearing DMA receive control register right after it is set

4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>

[ Upstream commit fcdefccac976ee51dd6071832b842d8fb41c479c ]

Current bgmac code initializes some DMA settings in the receive control
register for some hardware and then immediately clears those settings.
Not clearing those settings results in ~420Mbps *improvement* in
throughput; this system can now receive frames at line-rate on Broadcom
5871x hardware compared to ~520Mbps today.  I also tested a few other
values but found there to be no discernible difference in CPU
utilization even if burst size and prefetching values are different.

On the hardware tested there was no need to keep the code that cleared
all but bits 16-17, but since there is a wide variety of hardware that
used this driver (I did not look at all hardware docs for hardware using
this IP block), I find it wise to move this call up and clear bits just
after reading the default value from the hardware rather than completely
removing it.

This is a good candidate for -stable >=3.14 since that is when the code
that was supposed to improve performance (but did not) was introduced.

Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>
Fixes: 56ceecde1f29 ("bgmac: initialize the DMA controller of core...")
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
@@ -307,6 +307,10 @@ static void bgmac_dma_rx_enable(struct b
 	u32 ctl;

 	ctl = bgmac_read(bgmac, ring->mmio_base + BGMAC_DMA_RX_CTL);
+
+	/* preserve ONLY bits 16-17 from current hardware value */
+	ctl &= BGMAC_DMA_RX_ADDREXT_MASK;
+
 	if (bgmac->feature_flags & BGMAC_FEAT_RX_MASK_SETUP) {
 		ctl &= ~BGMAC_DMA_RX_BL_MASK;
 		ctl |= BGMAC_DMA_RX_BL_128 << BGMAC_DMA_RX_BL_SHIFT;
@@ -317,7 +321,6 @@ static void bgmac_dma_rx_enable(struct b
 		ctl &= ~BGMAC_DMA_RX_PT_MASK;
 		ctl |= BGMAC_DMA_RX_PT_1 << BGMAC_DMA_RX_PT_SHIFT;
 	}
-	ctl &= BGMAC_DMA_RX_ADDREXT_MASK;
 	ctl |= BGMAC_DMA_RX_ENABLE;
 	ctl |= BGMAC_DMA_RX_PARITY_DISABLE;
 	ctl |= BGMAC_DMA_RX_OVERFLOW_CONT;