[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG2=9p_SUGt4GPNvegV78se_rVau1Pzn-=TyObH+SiO+ETtOiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:18:00 +0800
From: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@....com>, Tor Jeremiassen <tor@...com>,
philippe.langlais@...com, Nicolas GUION <nicolas.guion@...com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Lyra Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/3] tracing: add a possibility of exporting function
trace to other places instead of ring buffer only
On 19 November 2016 at 00:45, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:57:53 +0200
> Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
>>
>> > This looks good to me, although I would like this to go through my tree
>> > (to make sure it gets all my testing). I understand the next two
>> > patches depend on this, how would you want to go about that?
>> >
>> > One is that I can pull it in the next merge window, and the rest go in
>> > after that. Or I can take the other two patches with the proper acks as
>> > well.
>>
>> I just asked for the last patch be split 4 ways, but otherwise, they
>> have my acks. If Chunyan can do that, you can take all of them into your
>> tree.
>>
>
> OK, I'll wait for the split then.
OK, I will split that and send another patch-set with Alex's acks.
Many thanks for the reviews from you two,
Chunyan
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists