linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal/intel_powerclamp: Convert to CPU hotplug state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161121115723.GB14582@pathway.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:57:23 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal/intel_powerclamp: Convert to CPU hotplug
 state

On Tue 2016-11-15 08:40:57, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:36:26 +0800
> Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 11:12 -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:34:10 +0100
> > > Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > 
> > > > Please, let me known if I should do this as a separate patch
> > > > and/or resend the patchset.  
> > > Rui/Eduardo,
> > > There are four independent posted changes made to powerclamp driver:
> > > Should I roll them into one set such that you can easily apply them?
> > > 1. add back module device table https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/14/760
> > > 2. kworker, this patchset
> > > 3. cpu hotplug state, this patch.
> > > 4. PF_IDLE https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/14/747
> > >   
> > hmm, I will apply patch 1 and queue up for next -rc and 4.8 stable.
> > 
> > please resend the others that are targeted for 4.10 and later in one
> > patch set.
> OK, will do. I guess Petr and Sebastian are OK with me putting your
> powerclamp changes in one patchset too?

Sure. I am fine with it.

Best Regards,
Petr