[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161115084057.1475dbfc@jacob-builder>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:40:57 -0800
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal/intel_powerclamp: Convert to CPU hotplug
state
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:36:26 +0800
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 11:12 -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:34:10 +0100
> > Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Please, let me known if I should do this as a separate patch
> > > and/or resend the patchset.
> > Rui/Eduardo,
> > There are four independent posted changes made to powerclamp driver:
> > Should I roll them into one set such that you can easily apply them?
> > 1. add back module device table https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/14/760
> > 2. kworker, this patchset
> > 3. cpu hotplug state, this patch.
> > 4. PF_IDLE https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/14/747
> >
> hmm, I will apply patch 1 and queue up for next -rc and 4.8 stable.
>
> please resend the others that are targeted for 4.10 and later in one
> patch set.
OK, will do. I guess Petr and Sebastian are OK with me putting your
powerclamp changes in one patchset too?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists